Preparation of styrene homopolymers and styrene-ethlyene copolymers

ABSTRACT

The present invention discloses copolymers of styrene and ethylene with highly syndiotactic styrene blocks prepared with of a catalyst system comprising a metallocene catalyst component of the general formula (I): (Flu-R″—C p)M(n3-C3R′5)(ether)n wherein Cp is a cyclopentadienyl, substituted or unsubstituted, Flu is a fluorenyl, substituted or unsubstituted, M is a metal Group III of the Periodic Table, ether is a donor solvent molecule, R″ is a structural bridge between Cp and Flu (9 position) imparting stereorigidity to the component, each R′ is the same or different and is hydrogen or an hydrocarbyl having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 0, 1 or 2. It also discloses styrene-ethylene copolymers having a high styrene content in which styrene units form syndiotactic polystyrene blocks.

This invention relates to the field of homopolymerisation of styrene or copolymerisation of styrene and ethylene using allyl complexes of group 3 metals incorporating bridged cyclopentadienyl-fluorenyl ligands.

Ishiara et al. (Ishihara, N.; Seimiya, T.; Kuramoto, M.; Uoi, M in Macromolecules 1986, 19, 2464) were the first to report catalyst systems that were active in the preparation of highly syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS). These catalysts were based on hemimetallocene complexes of titanium activated by organoaluminum derivatives such as methylalumoxane (MAO).

Many efforts have been paid to expand the chemistry of half-sandwich titanocenes CpTiX₃ in the polymerisation of styrene such as for example Ishihara et al. (Ishihara, N.; Kuramoto, M.; Uoi, M. in Macromolecules 1988, 21, 3356 and references therein) or Pellechia et al. (Pellecchia, C.; Pappalardo, D.; Oliva, L.; Zambelli, A. in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6593 and references therein) or Wang et al. (Wang, Q.; Quyoum, R.; Gillis, D. J.; Tudoret, M.-J.; Jeremic, D.; Hunter, B. K.; Baird, M. G. in Organometallics 1996, 15, 693) or Knjazhanski et al. (Knjazhanski, S. Ya.; Cadenas, G.; Garcia, M.; Perez, C. M.; Nifant'ev, I. E.; Kashulin, I. A.; Ivchenko, P. V.; Lyssenko, K. in Organometallics 2002, 21, 3094).

Alternatives to cyclopentadienyl derivatives have also been investigated such as for example in Zambelli et al. (Zambelli, A.; Oliva, L.; Pellecchia, C. in Macromolecules 1989, 22, 2129) or in Liguori et al. (Liguori, D.; Centore, R.; Tuzi, A.; Grisi, F.; Sessa, I.; Zambelli, A. in Macromolecules 2003, 36, 5451).

Styrene polymerisation mediated by organometallic species of group 3 metals has been much less explored, and only a few examples of lanthanide-based catalysts have appeared to be significantly active for this purpose. The half-sandwich “constrained geometry” yttrium alkyl complex [(C₅Me₄—SiMe₂—N^(t)Bu)Y(μ-C₆H₁₃)(THF)]₂ gave, with moderate activity, atactic polystyrene (PS) with a number average molecular weight Mn of up to 61,000 and a polydispersity D of from 1.10 to 1.23. The polydispersity D is defined by the ratio Mw/Mn of the weight average molecular weight Mw over the number average molecular weight Mn (Hultzsch, K. C.; Voth, P.; Beckerle, K.; Spaniol, T. P.; Okuda, J. in Organometallics 2000, 19, 228).

The complex (C₅Me₅)La(CH(SiMe₃)₂)₂(THF) gave, with even lower activity, syndiotactic-enriched PS (rr of about 50%) with a number average molecular weight Mn of less than 16,000 and a polydispersity D of 1.6 (Tanaka, K.; Furo, M.; Ihara, E.; Yasuda, H.; in J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 1382).

Sluggish styrene polymerisation activity was reported for [(tBuC₅H₄)₂LnMe]₂ (Ln=Pr, Nd, Gd) by Shen (Shen, Z. in Polym. J. 1990, 22, 919) or for [(tBuC₅H₄)₂Yb(THF)₂][BPh₄] by Yuan et al. (Yuan, F.; Shen, Q.; Sun, J. in J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 538, 241) or for [Eu(CH₃CN)₃(BF₄)₃]_(n) by Thomas et al. (Thomas, R. R.; Chebolu, V.; Sen, A. in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4096) or for (tBuC₅H₄)₂Yb(μ-H)₂AlH(Et₂O)) by Khvostov et al. (Khvostov, A. V.; Belsky, V. K.; Sizov, A. I.; Bulychev, B. M.; Ivchenko, N. B. in J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 531, 19) or for the (C₅Me₅)₂NdCl₂Li(Et₂O)₂In—Bu₂Mg system by Bogaert et al. (Bogaert, S.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Chenal, T.; Mortreux, A.; Ricart, G. in Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2000, 201, 1813). All these complexes gave atactic styrene polymers.

Up to now, the highest activity among organolanthanides was ascertained to polymeric Sm(II) derivatives [Sm(R)(THF)_(x)(C₅Me₅)₂K(THF)]_(n) wherein R was selected from CH(SiMe₃)₂, SiH₃, OAr, SAr, PHAr or N(SiMe₃)₂). The resulting polymers were atactic, had a number average molecular weight Mn ranging 82,000 to 350,000 and a polydispersity of from 1.45 to 2.45 (Hou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tezuka, H.; Xie, P.; Tardif, O.; Koizumi, T.-A.; Yamazaki, H.; Wakatsuki, Y. in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10533).

Allyl complexes such as Ln(C₃H₅)₃(Solv)_(n), [Ln(C₃H₅)_(4])Li(Solv)_(n), [(Cp-CMe₂CMe₂-Cp)Ln(C₃H₅)]Li(Solv)_(n) and(CpCMe₂CMe₂Cp)Ln(C₃H₅) wherein Ln is Nd or Sm have been reported to produce syndiotactic-rich (rrrr<70%) or isotactic-rich (mmmm<80%) polystyrene with number average molecular weight Mn ranging from 5,000 to 320,000 and polydispersity D of from 1.3 to 4.7 (Baudry-Barbier, D.; Camus, E.; Dormond, A.; Visseaux, M. in Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 13, 813).

None of the complexes disclosed so far have been able to achieve controlled highly stereospecific polymerisation of styrene.

It is an aim of this invention to provide a catalyst system that is active in the homo- or co-polymerisation of styrene without co-catalyst.

It is also an aim of the present invention to provide a catalyst system able to prepare highly syndiotactic polystyrene.

It is a further aim of the present invention to provide a catalyst system able to prepare styrene-ethylene copolymers having a large percentage of styrene.

It is yet a further aim of the present invention to provide a catalyst system able to prepare styrene-ethylene copolymers having single ethylene units dispersed in the polymeric chain.

It is another aim of the present invention to provide a catalyst system able to prepare styrene-ethylene copolymers having an alternated ethylene-styrene structure.

Accordingly, the present invention discloses styrene-ethylene copolymers with either highly syndiotactic styrene blocks when the amount of styrene in the copolymer is of more than 90 mol % up to 99.5 mol % or alternated ethylene-styrene structures when the amount of styrene in the copolymer is of from 45 to 90 mol %, said copolymers being prepared with a catalyst system comprising a metallocene catalyst component of the general formula (Flu-R″-Cp)M(η³-C₃R′₅)(ether)_(n)  (I) wherein Cp is a cyclopentadienyl, substituted or unsubstituted, Flu is a fluorenyl, substituted or unsubstituted, M is a metal Group 3 of the Periodic Table, R″ is a structural bridge between Cp and Flu (9-position) imparting stereorigidity to the component, ether is a donor solvent molecule, each R′ is the same or different and is hydrogen or an hydrocarbyl having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 0, 1 or 2.

The catalyst system of the present invention does not require the use of an activating agent or co-catalyst.

Preferably the styrene-ethylene copolymer contains from 75, more preferably from 85 to 90 mol % of styrene for preparing copolymers having alternated ethylene-styrene structures. For producing the styrene-ethylene copolymer having highly syndiotactic styrene blocks, the amount of styrene is preferably of at from 95 to 99 mol %.

The substituents on the cyclopentadienyl are not particularly limited, they can be the same or different and they include hydrocarbyls having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and silyl groups SiR′₃ wherein R′ is defined as before as hydrogen or an hydrocarbyl having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms.

The substituents on the fluorenyl are not particularly limited, they can be the same or different and they include hydrocarbyls having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and silyl groups SiR′₃.

In the allyl group C₃R′₅, R′ includes hydrogen or an hydrocarbyl having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms. It may also include a silyl group or a polybutadienyl chain.

The type of bridge present between the cyclopentadienyl and the fluorenyl in the above-described catalysts is not itself particularly limited. Typically R″ comprises an alkylidene group having 1 to 20 carbon atoms, a germanium group (e.g. a dialkyl germanium group), a silicon group (e.g. a dialkyl silicon group), a siloxane group (e.g. a dialkyl siloxane group), an alkyl phosphine group or an amine group. Preferably, the substituent comprises a silyl radical or a hydrocarbyl radical having at least one carbon atom, to form the bridge, or a substituted or unsubstituted ethylenyl radical (e.g. —CH₂CH₂—). More preferably R″ is isopropylidene (Me₂C), Ph₂C, ethylenyl (CH₂CH₂), Me₂Si, or Ph₂Si, and most preferably R″ is (Me₂C).

M is preferably yttrium, lanthanum or a member of the lanthanide series. Throughout this description, the term “lanthanide series” means the rare earth series of elements having atomic numbers of from 58 to 71. M is preferably yttrium, lanthanum, neodymium or samarium. More preferably, M is neodymium.

The ether is generally a donor solvent molecule. Ether is preferably an acyclic or a cyclic aliphatic ether, such as diethylether (Et₂O) or tetrahydrofurane (THF). Preferably the ether is tetrahydrofurane.

LIST OF FIGURES

FIG. 1 represents the ¹H NMR spectrum of complex [Flu-CMe₂-Cp]Y(C₃H₅)(THF) in toluene.

FIG. 2 represents the ¹H NMR spectrum of complex [Flu-CMe₂-Cp]Y(C₃H₅)(THF) in toluene at a temperature of −70° C.

FIG. 3 represents the crystal structure of (Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF).

FIG. 4 represents the crystal structure of [(3-tBu-C₅H₃)—CMe₂-Flu]Nd(allyl)(THF).

FIG. 5 represents the yield expressed in % as a function of time expressed in minutes for the bulk polymerisation of styrene in the presence of the allyl complex (Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF) at a polymerisation temperature of 60° C. and a [Styrene]-to-[Nd] ratio of 600.

FIG. 6 represents the number average molecular weight Mn as a function of yield in % for a polystyrene prepared with the neodymium complex (Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF) at a temperature of 60° C., in bulk polymerisation and with a [Styrene]-to-[Nd] ratio of 600.

FIG. 7 represents the ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectrum of a non-fractionated polymer of styrene obtained with the neodymium complex (Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF).

FIG. 8 represents the Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) diagram for a syndiotactic polystyrene prepared with the neodymium complex (Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF).

FIG. 9 represents the DMA diagram for a syndiotactic polystyrene prepared with a CpTiCl₃/MAO catalyst system.

FIG. 10 represents the methylene and methine region of the ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectra (75-125 MHz, at 25° C., in CDCl₃) of ethylene-styrene copolymers obtained with the neodymium complex (Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF). and having respectively a styrene content of about 45 mol % for (a), of about 60 mol % for (b), of about 84 mol % for (c) and of about 95 mol % for (d).

FIG. 11 represents possible configurations of styrene and ethylene units in an ethylene-styrene copolymer.

FIG. 12 represents the glass transition temperature Tg expressed in ° C. as a function of styrene content expressed in mol % in the styrene-ethylene copolymer.

The preparation of the neutral allyl yttrium complex [Flu-R″-Cp]Y(2-R—C₃H₄)(THF) is carried out by reacting the anionic complex [(Cp-R″-Flu)YCl₂]⁻[Li(ether)₄]⁺ wherein ether is Et₂O or THF with one equivalent with respect to Y of ClMgC₃H₅ if R is hydrogen or with the methallyl Grignard reagent ClMg(2-Me-allyl) if R is Me.

The ¹H NMR characteristics for the Y complex, both in toluene (displayed in FIG. 1) and in THF at room temperature wherein R is H and R″ is CMe₂, are consistent with a symmetric structure in solution and include resonances for a symmetrically coordinated Cp-CMe₂-Flu ligand, a coordinated THF molecule and an allyl ligand. In the ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectrum (at 25° C. and in toluene-d₈) the bridgehead carbon atom of the fluorenyl moiety appears at 93.8 ppm. This value is to be compared to the chemical shift of 95.9 ppm reported for the corresponding carbon in [(η⁵,η³-Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Zr(μ-H)(Cl)]₂ or to the value of 103.5 ppm in [η³,η⁵-Flu-CMe₂-Cp)(η¹,η⁵-Flu-CMe₂-Cp)Y]⁻[Li(Et₂O)(THF)₃]⁺, or also to the value of 95.9 ppm in [(η³,η⁵-Flu-CMe₂-Cp)₂La]⁻[Li(OEt₂)₂]⁺. This suggests that reduced (η³-) coordination of the fluorenyl ligand occurs in complex II in solution. The low temperature (−70° C.) ¹H NMR spectrum displayed in FIG. 2 suggests that the allyl moiety quantitatively, and reversibly upon heating, interconverts to a pseudo-alkyl form, consistent with a η³→η¹ haptotropic shift as investigated for example by Yoder et al. (Yoder, J. C.; Day, M. W.; Bercaw, J. E., in Organometallics, 1998, 17, 4946) or by Abrams et al. (Abrams, M. B.; Yoder, J. C.; Loeber, C.; Day, M. W.; Bercaw, J. E., in Organometallics, 1999, 18, 1389) for a set of ansa-biscyclopentadienyl scandium and yttrium allyls. FIG. 2 shows that this low temperature form is dissymmetric on the NMR time-scale showing eight sharp resonances for the Flu moiety, four resonances for the Cp moiety, and two resonances for the isopropylidene bridge methyl groups. The terminal alkyl fragment —CH₂—CH═CH₂ is presented by a set of three resonances that includes a signal at δ=5.81 ppm for the methine protons that overlaps with one CpH resonance, a broad singlet at δ=3.62 ppm for the terminal methylene group, and two broad signals at δ=−0.38 and −0.43 ppm for the two diastereotopic protons of the methylene group connected to the metal center.

The early lanthanide complexes are prepared in a similar manner by salt elimination reaction of the dilithium salt [Flu-R″-Cp]Li₂ with one equivalent of LnCl₃(THF)_(x) as illustrated in scheme 1 wherein R″ is CMe₂.

Preferably, Ln is lanthanum, neodymium or samarium.

The crystal structure of the complex based on neodymium and determined by X-ray diffraction pattern is represented in FIG. 3.

The cyclopentadienyl ligand may be substituted. The synthesis of substituted complexes is carried out directly from the modified (substituted) ligand (R′C₅H₃)H—R″-FluH in order to prepare the corresponding allyl complex as shown for example in scheme 2 wherein R″ is CMe₂, R′ is H, the Cp is substituted at the 3-position by a tert-butyl group, the metal is Y, and ether is THF.

FIG. 4 represents the crystal structure of [(3-tBu-C₅H₃)—CMe₂-Flu]Nd(allyl)(THF).

All these allyl complexes are active in the polymerisation of styrene, under mild conditions, and without activating agent or co-catalyst. The resulting polystyrene is highly syndiotactic. Mild conditions imply that the polymerisation is carried out either in toluene solution or in bulk and at temperatures ranging from 10 to 120° C., preferably from 15 to 80° C. and more preferably from 20 to 60° C. The activities vary with the Group 3 metal selected and ranking them in order of increasing activity, the yttrium has the lowest activity, followed by lanthanum, samarium and neodymium that has the highest activity. It must be noted that the activity trend does not follow the order of metal atomic radii. It can be speculated that it reflects, in part, the stability of the complex under polymerisation conditions.

The styrene polymerisation reactions mediated by these allyl complexes all feature an induction period as seen in FIG. 5 representing the yield as a function of polymerisation time for a complex based on neodymium. In addition, it is observed that when the polymerisation temperature is increased from 50° C. to 60° C., a significant increase in activity is observed, which is greater than that expected from the simple influence of temperature on kinetics. These observations suggest the existence of a pre-activation step, possibly related to dissociation of a THF molecule from the metal center in the pre-catalyst. Polymerisations of bulk styrene led to 70-85% maximum monomer conversions. Since sPS is not soluble under the reaction conditions and precipitates during polymerisation, mass transfer limitations likely take place, which may eventually cause reduction of the polymer yield. At the same time, introduction of toluene in the polymerisation medium, which can act as a solvent for the monomer, is detrimental for catalyst activity. This can stem from competitive coordination of toluene onto the metal center that blocks the subsequent attack of the π-system of the styrene vinyl group. Polymerisation is thus preferably carried out without solvent or with cyclohexane.

The number average molecular weight Mn of the polymers obtained with these systems is in the range 10,000 up to 300,000, preferably up to 200,000 and more preferably up to 150,000 g·mol⁻¹. The polydispersity is narrow and typically ranges from 1.1 to 3.5, preferably from 1.2 to 3, indicating a single-site behavior of the catalyst. Large polydispersities ranging from 2 to 6 have been observed for polystyrene samples produced over long periods: this behavior may arise from a gradual catalyst decomposition with time. For polydispersities smaller than 1.3, the experimental values of the number average molecular weight Mn are usually somewhat higher than the calculated values, reflecting a moderate initiation efficiency.

FIGS. 6 and 7 represent respectively the molecular weights Mn as a function of yield of the polymer for polymerisation reactions using the yttrium and neodymium complexes wherein R″ is CMe₂, R′ is H, and ether is THF. These appear approximately linear in the first stage of the polymerisation but show afterwards a saturation limit.

The microstructure of the polystyrene obtained with these allyl-lanthanide complexes is highly syndiotactic. A typical ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectrum of a non-fractionated (crude) polymer sample obtained with a neodymium complex is shown in FIG. 8, which presents a single sharp resonance at δ=145.5 ppm attributed to the phenyl ipso carbon of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS), giving a rrrr pentad abundance of at least 90%, preferably of at least 95% and more preferably of at least 98%. High melting temperatures ranging from 250 to 269° C. also confirm the high syndiotacticity of the polystyrene. The glass transition temperature (T_(g)=111.5° C.) and the Young modulus (E=2,320 MPa at 35° C.), both determined by DMA and represented in FIG. 9, compare well with the corresponding values determined under the same conditions (T_(g)=110.8° C.; E=2,920 MPa at 30° C.) for a sPS sample prepared independently with the CpTiCl₃/MAO system and represented in FIG. 10.

The allyl complexes of the present invention have little or no activity in the polymerisation of ethylene and the system deactivates rapidly. Some of the complexes, however, particularly those based on neodymium, show significant and persistent activities in the copolymerisation of ethylene with styrene under similar conditions: these activities range from 40 to 280 kg of copolymer per mole of catalyst per hour. The copolymers recovered are soluble at room temperature in THF or in CHCl₃ and have number average molecular weights Mn in the range of 10,000 to 200,000 and more preferably from 75,000 to 150,000. They have a polydispersity ranging from 1.1 to 3.5, preferably from 1.4 to 1.85. The amount of styrene incorporated in the copolymers varies over a wide range: it ranges from 10 to 99 mol %, preferably from 45 to 99 mol %, more preferably from 85 to 99 mol %, even more preferably from 90 to 98 mol % and most preferably from 95 to 99 mol %, as determined by ¹H NMR: it depends mainly upon the styrene concentration and upon the ethylene pressure. The ethylene-styrene copolymers prepared according to the present invention have amounts of incorporated styrene significantly higher than those obtained with the prior art catalyst systems and the ethylene is randomly distributed in the polymer chain. The copolymers obtained according to the present invention also have a very high Young's modulus, typically indicative of high rigidity. The value of the Young's modulus is in part determined by the polymerisation conditions and by the type of solvent used during polymerisation.

Because of the high styrene content of the copolymer, its solubility in polystyrene is substantially improved.

The microstructure of the ethylene-styrene copolymers is determined by ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectroscopy as shown in FIG. 11 and the spectra are consistent with the presence of ethylene units randomly distributed over the polymer chain. For an ethylene-rich copolymer containing about 45 mol % of styrene, several resonances are assigned to the configurations of styrene and ethylene explained in FIG. 12: the sequences observed are respectively SEES (δ=27.1 ppm), ESSE (δ=37.9, 38.1, 43.1 ppm), and ESE (δ=37.1 ppm), and a low intensity resonance attributable to a EEE/EESEE sequence (δ=29.9-30.1 ppm). The latter sequence is no longer observed in the spectra of copolymer samples that have high styrene content as seen in FIGS. 11 c and d. For the styrene-rich copolymers, the spectra show an increase in the intensity of the resonances attributable to SSSE and SSSS sequences (δ 40.7-42.9 ppm). The degree of stereospecificity of the styrene units in the copolymer is determined by ¹³C{¹H}. NMR: it is observed that the stereocontrol of the styrene insertion increases with increasing styrene feed.

The allyl complexes of the present invention, and particularly neodymium are prominent single-site catalysts for highly syndiospecific polymerisation of styrene. They are also able to prepare ethylene-styrene copolymers having a very high styrene content, randomly distributed ethylene in the polymer chain and very high Young's modulus. In addition these systems have a very high activity.

Without wishing to be bound by a theory, it is speculated that the syndiotactic structure of polystyrene can be attributed to chain end control mechanism in combination with the catalyst component symmetry. Selecting a cyclopentadienyl-fluorenyl catalyst component that does not have a purely Cs symmetry and carries one or more substituents on the cyclopentadienyl or fluorenyl does not destroy the syndiotacticity of the resulting polymer.

EXAMPLES

All manipulations were performed under a purified argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques or in a glovebox. Solvents were distilled from Na/benzophenone (THF, Et₂O) and Na/K alloy (toluene, pentane) under nitrogen, degassed thoroughly and stored under nitrogen prior to use. Deuterated solvents (benzene-d₆, toluene-d₈, THF-d₈; >99.5% D, Eurisotop) were vacuum-transferred from Na/K alloy into storage tubes.

YCl₃(THF)_(3.5), LaCl₃(THF)_(1.5) and SmCl₃(THF)₂ were obtained after repeated extraction of YCl₃, LaCl₃ and SmCl₃ (Strem) from THF or just prior to use by refluxing the anhydrous lanthanide chloride in THF for 2 h and subsequent evaporation. Ionic complex [(Cp-CMe₂-Flu)YCl₂]⁻[Li(ether)₄]⁺ was prepared as reported by Kirillov et al. (Kirillov, E.; Toupet, L.; Lehmann, C. W.; Razavi, A.; Kahlal, S.; Saillard, J.-Y.; Carpentier, J.-F. in Organometallics 2003, 22, 4038).

NMR spectra of complexes and polymers were recorded on Bruker AC-200, AC-300 and AM-500 spectrometers in Teflon-valved NMR tubes at 23° C. unless otherwise indicated. ¹H and ¹³C chemical shifts were reported vs. SiMe₄ and were determined by reference to the residual solvent peaks. Assignment of resonances for organometallic complexes was made from ¹H—¹H COSY, ¹H—¹³C HMQC and HMBC NMR experiments. Coupling constants are given in Hertz. Elemental analyses were performed by the Microanalytical Laboratory at the Institute of Chemistry of Rennes and are the average of two independent determinations.

Room temperature GPC analysis of polymers was performed in THF with a Waters apparatus. High temperature GPC analyses were carried out in trichlorobenzene at a temperature of from 135 to 155° C. in the research centers of ATOFINA Research in Feluy and in Lacq.

DMA was carried out at the university of Lorient.

Preparation of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Y(C₃H₅)(THF).

To a suspension of 0.390 g of ionic complex [(Cp-CMe₂-Flu)YCl₂]⁻[Li(ether)₄]⁺ (1) in 20 mL of toluene, 0.27 mL of a 2.0 M solution in THF of allylmagnesium chloride (0.54 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 hours at room temperature (about 25° C.). The resulting yellowish-brown solution was filtered and volatiles were removed in vacuum. The residue was washed twice with 15 mL of pentane and dried in vacuum to give 0.16 g of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Y(C₃H₅)(THF) (2) as a yellow powder with a yield of 65%. The ¹H NMR (toluene-d₈, 200 MHz, 50° C.) spectrum was as follows: δ 7.90 (d, 4H, J_(HH)=7.0, Flu), 7.0-6.8 (m, 4H, Flu), 5.82 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=2.6, Cp), 5.59 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=2.6, Cp), 3.13 (br m, 4H, α-CH₂, THF), 2.45 (br m, 2H, α-CH₂, THF), 2.24 (s, 6H, CH₃), 1.93 (br m, 4H, CH₂CHCH₂), 1.21 (br m, 4H, (3β-CH₂, THF). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (toluene-d₈, 75 MHz, 25° C.): δ 144.5 (CH₂CHCH₂), 130.3 (quat., Cp), 125.3 (quat., Flu), 123.9 (Flu), 121.9 (Flu), 121.6 (Flu), 118.7 (quat., Flu), 117.1 (Flu), 109.6 (Cp), 99.2 (Cp), 93.8 (C-9, Flu), 72.5 (α-CH₂, THF), 68.8 (CH₂CHCH₂), 40.6 (C(CH₃)₂), 29.7 (C(CH₃)₂), 25.3 (β-CH₂, THF). ¹H NMR (THF-d₈, 300 MHz, −70° C.): δ 7.93 (d, 2H, J_(HH)=7.7, Flu), 7.63 (d, 2H, J_(HH)=7.7, Flu), 7.05 (t, 2H, Flu), 6.49 (t, 2H, Flu), 6.23 (s, 2H, Cp), 5.57 (s, 2H, Cp), 4.66 (m, 2H, J_(HH)=13.0, CH₂CHCH₂) 1.86 (s, 6H, CH₃), 1.52 (d, 4H, J_(HH)=13.0, CH₂CHCH₂). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (THF-d₈, 75 MHz, −70° C.): δ 143.2 (CH₂CHCH₂), 132.8, 130.8, 125.6, 120.8, 120.3, 110.3, 110.1, 107.1, 106.8, 103.7, 103.5, 98.6 (Flu and Cp), 57.7 (CH₂CHCH₂), 38.5 (CCH₃). The calculated values for C₂₈H₃₁OY were: C, 71.18; H, 6.61 and the experimental values were: C, 70.85; H, 6.65.

Preparation of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Y(2-Me-C₃H₄)(THF).

To a suspension of 0.530 g of product (1) in 20 mL of toluene, 1.46 mL of a 0.5 M solution in THF (0.73 mmol) of 2-methallylmagnesiumchloride were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 hours at room temperature. The resulting red-brown solution was filtered and volatiles were removed in vacuum. The yellow-brown residue was washed twice in 15 mL of toluene and dried in vacuum to give 0.33 g of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Y(2-Me-C₃H₄)(THF) (3) as a bright-yellow powder with a yield of 92%. The calculated and experimental values for C₂₉H₃₃OY were respectively of: C, 71.60; H, 6.84. and of C, 71.28; H, 6.33.

Preparation of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)La(C₃H₅)(THF).

To a solution of 0.554 g of FluH-CMe₂-CpH (2.03 mmol) in 50 mL of diethyl ether at a temperature of −10° C., 2 equivalents of n-BuLi (2.54 mL of a 1.6 M solution in hexane or 4.07 mmol) were added under vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. The solution turned dark-yellow and after 3 to 4 hours, a yellow crystalline powder precipitated. To this solution of the dilithium salt in ether cooled to a temperature of −20° C., a suspension of 0.792 g of LaCl₃(THF)₂ (2.03 mmol) in 20 mL of Et₂O was added. Upon vigorous stirring and warming to room temperature, the reaction mixture turned pink. The solution was evaporated in vacuum to give a pink solid powder. To the latter 30 mL of toluene were added and a solution of 1.02 mL of a 2.0 M solution in THF of allylmagnesiumchloride (2.04 mmol) was injected by syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 hours at room temperature. The resulting red-orange solution was filtered and volatiles were removed in vacuum. The residue was recrystallized from a (1:5) THF/toluene mixture and dried in vacuum to give 0.53 g of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)La(C₃H₅)(THF) (4) as an orange powder with a yield of 50%. The calculated and experimental values for C₂₅H₃₁LaO were respectively of: C, 64.37; H, 5.98 and of C, 64.05; H, 5.00.

Preparation of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF).

Complex (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Nd(C₃H₅)(THF) (5) was prepared from 0.554 g of FluH-CMe₂-CpH (2.03 mmol), 0.792 g of NdCl₃(THF)₂ (2.03 mmol) and 1.02 mL of a 2.0 M solution in THF of allylmagnesiumchloride (2.04 mmol) using a similar synthetic procedure as that described above for complex (4) and isolated as 0.920 g of brown-green powder with a yield of 86%. The calculated and experimental values for C₂₈H₃₁NdO were respectively of: C, 63.72; H, 5.92 and of C, 62.57; H, 5.34.

Preparation of (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Sm(C₃H₅)(THF).

Complex (Cp-CMe₂-Flu)Sm(C₃H₅)(THF) (6) was prepared from 0.607 g of FluH-CMe₂-CpH (2.23 mmol), of 0.893 g of SmCl₃(THF)₂ (2.23 mmol) and 1.11 mL of a 2.0 M solution in THF of allylmagnesiumchloride (2.23 mmol), using a similar synthetic procedure as that described above for complex (4) and isolated as 1.04 g of brown powder with a yield of 87%. The calculated and experimental values for C₂₈H₃₁SmO were respectively of: C, 62.99; H, 5.85 and of C, 62.00; H, 5.38.

Preparation of [(3-tBu-C₅H₃)—CMe₂-Flu]YCl(THF).

To a solution of 0.596 g of (3-tBu-CpH)-CMe₂-FluH (1.814 mmol) in 50 mL of Et₂O at a temperature of −10° C., 2 equiv. of n-BuLi (2.27 mL of a 1.6 M solution in hexane or 3.32 mmol) were added under vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and the solution turned pink after 4 hours. To this solution of the dilithium salt in ether cooled to a temperature of −20° C. a suspension of 0.812 g of YCl₃(THF)_(3.5) (1.814 mmol) in 30 mL of Et₂O was added. Upon vigorous stirring and warming to room temperature, the reaction mixture turned bright yellow. This solution was decanted, separated from the precipitate, and volatiles were removed in vacuum to give 0.825 g of [(3-tBu-C₅H₃)—CMe₂-Flu]YCl(THF) (7) as a bright-yellow powder with a yield of 87%. The ¹H NMR spectrum (300 MHz, toluene-d₈, −50° C.) was as follows: δ 8.27 (d, 1H, J_(HH)=8.0, Flu), 7.94 (d, 1H, J_(HH)=8.0, Flu), 7.80 (d, 1H, J_(HH)=8.0, Flu), 7.67 (d, 1H, J_(HH)=8.0, Flu), 7.37 (m, 2H, Flu), 6.82 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=8.0, Flu), 6.62 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=8.0, Flu), 6.12 (br t, 1H, Cp), 5.60 (br t, 1H, Cp), 5.47 (br t, 1H, Cp), 2.76 (dd, 4H, ²J_(HH)=17.9, ³J_(HH)=6.8, α-CH₂, THF), 2.29 (s, 6H, CMe₂), 1.44 (s, 9H, tBu), 0.70 (br m, 4H, β-CH₂, THF). ¹H NMR (200 MHz, toluene-d₈, 25° C.) δ 8.16 (m, 1H, Flu), 8.00-7.70 (m, 3H, Flu), 7.35-7.20 (m, 2H, Flu), 6.89 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=7.4, Flu), 6.67 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=7.4, Flu), 6.09 (br t, 1H, Cp), 5.57 (m, 2H, Cp), 3.08 (br m, 4H, α-CH₂, THF), 2.29 (s, 6H, CMe₂), 1.34 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.08 (br m, 4H, β-CH₂, THF). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (toluene-d₈, 75 MHz, 25° C.): δ 142.1 (quat. Cp), 125.4 (quat. C, Cp, overlapped with signals from quat. C from Flu), 125.3 (overlapped with toluene), 123.8, 122.3, 120.42, 119.6, 119.5, 119.3 (two signals overlapped), 117.0 (1,8-C, Flu), 106.8 (Cp), 102.2 (Cp), 101.7 (Cp), 93.3 (9-C, Flu), 71.3 (α-C, THF), 40.8 (C(CH₃)₂), 32.4 (C(CH₃)₃), 31.2 (C(CH₃)₃), 29.7 (C(CH₃), CMe₂), 29.5 (C(CH₃), CMe₂), 25.0 (β-C, THF). The calculated and experimental values for C₂₉H₃₄ClOY are respectively of: C, 66.61; H, 6.55 and of C, 66.01; H, 6.87.

Preparation of [(3-tBu-C₅H₃)—CMe₂-Flu]Y(C₃H₅)(THF).

To a solution of 0.17 g of complex (6) (0.325 mmol) in 20 mL of toluene 0.16 mL of a 2.0 M solution in toluene of allylmagnesium bromide (0.320 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 8 hours at room temperature, the resulting orange solution was filtered and volatiles were removed in vacuum. The orange-yellow crystalline residue was washed twice with 3 mL of with pentane to give 0.12 g of [(3-tBu-C₅H₃)—CMe₂-Flu]Y(C₃H₅)(THF) (8) with a yield of 69%. The ¹H NMR spectrum (300 MHz, toluene-d₈, 25° C.) was as follows: δ 8.02 (d, 1H, J_(HH)=8.6, Flu), 7.95 (d, 1H, J_(HH)=8.6, Flu), 7.79 (m, 2H, Flu), 7.15-6.85 (m, 4H overlapped with toluene signals, Flu), 6.20 (q, 1H, J_(HH)=12.2, CH₂CHCH₂), 5.82 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=2.7, Cp), 5.73 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=2.7, Cp), 5.47 (t, 1H, J_(HH)=2.7, Cp), 3.02 (br s, 4H, α-CH₂, THF), 2.20 (s, 3H, CMe₂), 2.17 (s, 3H, CMe₂), 1.83 (br d, 4H, J_(HH)=12.2, CH₂CHCH₂), 1.13 (br s, 4H, (3β-CH₂, THF), 1.09 (s, 9H, CCH₃), ¹³C{¹H} NMR (toluene-d₈, 75 MHz, 25° C.): δ 149.5 (CH₂CHCH₂), 139.1 (C-1, quat., Cp) 128.8 (Flu), 126.3 (quat., Flu), 125.5 (quat., Flu), 125.4 (C-3, quat., Cp), 125.2 (Flu), 122.4 (Flu), 122.1 (Flu), 120.5 and 120.4 (Flu), 119.8 and 119.6 (quat., Flu), 117.8 and 117.4 (Flu), 106.4 (Cp), 100.2 (Cp), 99.4 (Cp), 91.5 (C-9, Flu), 71.7 (α-CH₂, THF), 70.4 (CH₂CHCH₂), 40.5 (CMe₂), 31.9 (C(CH₃)₃), 31.6 (C(CH₃)₃), 29.6 (C(CH₃)₂), 24.9 (β-CH₂, THF). The calculated and experimental values for C₃₂H₃₉Y were respectively of: C, 72.72; H, 7.44 and of C, 71.96; H, 6.88.

Typical Procedure for the Polymerisation of Styrene.

In the glovebox, a pre-weighted amount of allyl-lanthanide complex of about 15 mg was added to 3.0 mL of styrene (26.0 mmol) and vigorous stirring at the appropriate temperature was immediately started. After a given period of time, the Schlenk tube was opened to air and 1 mL of a 10% solution of HCl in methanol was added to quench the reaction. The polymer precipitated during the polymerisation reaction, was washed repeatedly with about 500 mL of methanol, filtered and dried in vacuum. Experimental parameters and results are displayed in Table I, wherein complexes 2, 4 and 5 are respectively based on yttrium, lanthanum and neodymium.

TABLE I T Time TOF Mn Tm Complex Solvent St/Ln ° C. min Yield % h⁻¹ (10³) D ° C. 2 — 800 20 60 4 32 9 5.25 252/261 2 — 800 20 120 8 32 8 4.39 nd 2 — 800 20 300 15 24 11 4.29 255/263 2^(e) — 800 20 60 28 376 17 2.05 269 2^(e) toluene 800 20 120 26 70 15 1.40 268 2 — 800 20 120 26 104 24 2.27 268 2 toluene 800 60 20 8 213 15 1.64 253/262 2 toluene 800 60 40 20 242 19 1.84 246/262 2 toluene 800 60 60 26 208 22 1.92 246/262 2 toluene 800 60 120 41 164 23 2.27 253/263 4 — 600 20 240 14 21 48 4.73 260 4 — 600 60 5 16 1152 20 1.22 257 5 — 700 20 60 33 231 66 1.39 252/260 5 — 400 20 120 19 38 nd nd nd 5 — 500 20 120 19 47 24 4.05 nd 5 — 800 50 5 13 1248 nd nd nd 5 — 800 50 5 11 1056 12 1.25 nd 5 — 650 60 2.5 6 936 6 1.13 256 5 — 600 60 2.5 11 1600 21 1.25 262 5 — 600 60 3 15 1800 nd nd nd 5 — 600 60 3.5 34 3500 35 1.31 nd 5 — 600 60 4 45 4050 50 1.28 261 5 — 600 60 5 70 5040 nd nd nd 5 — 600 60 5 84 6048 54 1.73 264 5 — 1100 50 95 59 410 71 2.27 265 5 — 2300 60 5 9 2484 62 1.50 nd 5 — 2300 60 10 64 7360 nd nd (Tg) 111.6 5 — 2300 60 10 51 7038 nd nd nd 5 — 2300 60 30 72 3312 135 2.09 263 5 — 4000 60 30 28 2240 128 2.60 nd 5 c-hex 600 60 5 32 2300 30 1.42 nd 5 toluene 1100 80 30 5 110 nd nd nd 5 —^(f) 600 60 10 20 720 nd nd nd 5^(g) —^(f) 3200 60 5 <1 nd nd nd nd 5^(g) — 3700 60 60 3 111 nd nd nd 5 —^(f) 4800 60 5 0 nd nd nd nd 5^(h) — 600 60 4 15 1350 51 1.99 nd 5^(f) — 1200 60 720 atact nd 6 — 600 60 5 28 2050 27 1.49 nd 6 — 600 60 15 89 2130 63 1.88 262 8 — 2000 60 1440 11 9 nd nd 261 ^(e)non recrystallized complex was used. ^(f)introduction of the catalyst as a toluene solution (1 mL) to preheated styrene. ^(g)Al(i-Bu)₃ was added in a [Al]/[Nd] ratio of 40. ^(h)introduction of the catalyst as a styrene solution (0.5 mL) to preheated styrene (3 to 5 mL).

Typical Procedure for Ethylene Polymerisation.

50 mL of toluene were introduced in a 300 mL-glass reactor (TOP-Industrie) equipped with a mechanical stirrer rotating at speeds of up to 1500 rpm. The reactor was kept at a temperature of 60° C. Toluene was saturated with ethylene (Air Liquide, N35) at a pressure of from 4 to 8 atmospheres, kept constant via a back-pressure regulator. A solution of 70 mg of allyl-neodymium complex (5) (0.133 mmol) in 10 mL of toluene was transferred via syringe into the reactor under stirring. The ethylene flow rate was monitored using a mass flowmeter (Aalborg, GFM17) connected to a totalising controller (KEP) acting as a flow rate integrator. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 3 mL of a 10% HCl methanol solution to the mixture. The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with methanol, and dried under vacuum.

Typical Procedure for Ethylene-Styrene Copolymerisation.

A 300 mL-glass reactor (TOP-Industrie) equipped with a mechanical stirrer rotating at speeds of up to 1500 rpm was charged with a mixture of cyclohexane or styrene at a temperature of 60° C. The solution was saturated with ethylene (Air Liquide, N35) at a pressure of 2 to 5 atmospheres, kept constant via a back-pressure regulator. A solution of 70 mg of allyl-neodymium complex (5) (0.133 mmol) in 10 mL of toluene was transferred via syringe into the reactor under stirring. The ethylene flow rate was monitored using a mass flowmeter (Aalborg, GFM17) connected to a totalising controller (KEP) acting as a flow rate integrator. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 3 mL of a 10% HCl methanol solution to the mixture. The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with methanol, and dried under vacuum. The experimental parameters and results are displayed in Table II.

TABLE II T Time Ex M Solvent Monomer A Comon. B [A]/[Ln] ° C. Press. atm. min. 1 Y toluene ethylene — — 80 5 120 2 Nd toluene ethylene — — 60 5 15 3 Y-sub c-hexane ethylene — — 80 8 5 4 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 60 8 120 5 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 1100 60 5 20 6 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 1300 60 2 120 7 Nd — styrene ethylene 3000 60 4 30 8 Nd — styrene ethylene 3000 60 1.5 20 9 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 60 1 17 10 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 60 1 30 11 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 60 1 20 12 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 80 1 18 13 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 60 1 120 14 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 600 80 1 120 15 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 1300 60 5 120 16 Nd c-hexane styrene ethylene 1300 80 5 30 17 Nd — styrene ethylene 600 60 1 10 18 Nd — styrene ethylene 600 60 1 10 19 Nd — styrene ethylene 600 80 1 5 20 Nd — styrene ethylene 600 60 5 30

Y-sub represents complex 8 based on yttrium and wherein the cyclopentadienyl is substituted in position 3 by a t-butyl.

TABLE II cont. A Exam- Acyivity mol Mn Tm Tg E ple Yield k/mol · h % 10³ D ° C. ° C. MPa 1 0 0 — — — — — — 2 0.9 24 100 1 1.97 128 nd nd 3 7 900 100 nd nd nd nd nd 4 4.1 15 45 21 3.10 nd 45  816 5 11.4 240 60 98 1.48 — 65 1487 6 14.2 53 78 124 1.71 — 91 1807 (25° C.) 7 14.5 225 84 137 1.79 — 70 1573 8 9.4 218 >95 75 2.17 — 91 1227 (25° C.) 9 5.6 129 >95 nd nd 232 100  1600 (20° C.) 10 1.3 24 >95 nd nd 220 nd nd 11 4.2 88 >95 nd nd 224 nd 1632 (20° C.) 12 8.4 191 >95 nd nd 241 nd  767 (20° C.) 13 7.4 26 90 nd nd nd 100  2057 (20° C.) 14 7.4 24 82 nd nd nd nd  995 (20° C.) 15 6 15 83 nd nd nd nd nd 16 10.6 108 76 nd nd nd nd nd 17 3.7 149 >95 nd nd nd 52  818 (20° C.) 18 6.8 277 >95 nd nd nd 85 1273 (20° C.) 19 10.6 850 >95 nd nd 223 66 1165 (20° C.) 20 11.2 152 90 nd nd nd 67 2123 (20° C.)

From this table, it appears as discussed in the description that the value of the Young's modulus is in part determined by the solvent and the polymerisation conditions. Examples 4, 5 and 6 were carried out with the same complex based on neodymium, in cyclohexane as solvent and with increasing amounts of styrene of respectively 45, 60, 78 mol %. The Young's modulus E and the glass transition temperature T₉ were seen to increase with increasing amounts of styrene. This behaviour can be seen in FIG. 12 representing the glass transition temperature as a function of styrene content in the copolymer. Examples 1 and 8 were carried out with the same neodymium complex as examples 4, 5 and 6, but the polymerisation was carried out in bulk (without additional solvent). The Young's modulus and glass transition temperature also increased with increasing amount of styrene, but they were smaller than those obtained when cyclohexane was used as solvent during polymerisation. The most important effect however is the decrease of the melting temperature Tm of styrene-ethylene copolymers containing at least 95 mol % of styrene, with respect to that of pure syndiotactic polystyrene. The melting temperature of syndiotactic polystyrene typically ranges from 255 to 270° C. It can be seen in Table II that examples 9 to 12 containing more than 95 mol % of styrene have a melting temperature of 220 to 240° C. These copolymers thus have the advantageous properties of syndiotactic polystyrene without having its difficult processability. It is speculated that the amount of ethylene present in the styrene-ethylene copolymer could be accurately derived from the melting temperature of the copolymer.

13C(1H) NMR for the integration.

The NMR spectra of the polymer were recorded at 25° C. in CDCl₃, using a Bruker AC300 spectrometer operating at 75 MHz. The spectrometer was operated using the following parameters: inversed gated decoupling; pulse width, 56°; acquisition time, 1.04 s; delay, 12 s; number of scans, 5100. 

1. A styrene ethylene copolymer having syndiotactic styrene blocks prepared by the copolymerization of ethylene and styrene in the presence of a catalyst system comprising a metallocene catalyst component characterized by the formula: (FluR″Cp)M(η³C₃R′₅)(ether)_(n) wherein Cp is a substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group, Flu is a substituted or unsubstituted fluorenyl group, R″ is a structural bridge between Cp and Flu imparting stereorigidity to the component, M is a metal Group III of the Periodic Table, each R′ is the same or different and is hydrogen, a silyl group of a hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 0, 1 or 2 said copolymer containing styrene in an amount within the range of 40-99% of styrene.
 2. The copolymer of claim 1 wherein said copolymer comprises syndiotatic polystyrene blocks separated by single ethylene units dispersed in the chain of said ethylene styrene copolymer wherein said copolymer comprises an alternating ethylene-styrene structure having a styrene content within the range 45-90 mol percent styrene.
 3. The copolymer of claim 2 wherein said styrene ethylene copolymer contains 75-90 mol percent of styrene.
 4. The copolymer of claim 2 wherein said styrene ethylene copolymer contains from 85-90 mol percent of styrene.
 5. The copolymer of claim 2 wherein said metallocene catalyst component is characterized by M being selected from the group consisting of yttrium, lanthanum, neodymium and samarium.
 6. The copolymer of claim 1 wherein said copolymer has an average of molecular weight of from 10,000 to 200,000 and a polydispersity of from 1.1 to 3.5.
 7. The composition of claim 6 wherein said copolymer has a polydispersity of from 1.2 to
 3. 8. The composition of claim 7 wherein said copolymer has a polydispersity of from 1.4-1.85.
 9. A styrene ethylene copolymer having syndiotactic styrene blocks prepared by the copolymerization of ethylene and styrene in the presence of a catalyst system comprising a metallocene catalyst component characterized by the formula: (FluR″Cp)M(η³C₃R′₅)(ether)_(n) wherein Cp is a substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group, Flu is a substituted or unsubstituted fluorenyl group, R″ is a structural bridge between Cp and Flu imparting stereorigidity to the component, M is a metal from Group III of the Periodic Table, each R′ is the same or different and is hydrogen, a silyl group of a hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 0, 1 or 2 said copolymer containing styrene in an amount within the range of 90-99.5 mol % of styrene.
 10. The copolymer of claim 9 wherein said copolymer comprises syndiotactic polystyrene blocks separated by single ethylene units dispersed in the chain of said ethylene styrene copolymer.
 11. The copolymer of claim 9 wherein said copolymer contains styrene in the amount within the range of 95-99 mol percent of said copolymer.
 12. The copolymer of claim 11 wherein said copolymer has a melting temperature within the range of 220-240° C.
 13. The copolymer of claim 9 wherein said syndiotatic styrene blocks comprise at least 90% rrrr pentads.
 14. The copolymer of claim 13 wherein said copolymer has a rrrr pentad content of at least 95%.
 15. A method for the copolymerization of styrene and ethylene to produce an ethylene styrene copolymer comprising providing a catalyst system catalyst component characterized by the formula (FluR″Cp)M(η³C₃R′₅)(ether)_(n) wherein Cp is a substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group, Flu is a substituted or unsubstituted fluorenyl group, R″ is a structural bridge between Cp and Flu imparting stereorigidity to the component, M is a metal from Group III of the Periodic Table, each R′ is the same or different and is hydrogen, a silyl group of a hydrocarbyl group having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 0, 1 or 2; introducing styrene monomer and ethylene copolymer in an amount in which the styrene monomer is present in said feedstream in an amount within the range of 90-99.5 mol percent; maintaining said polymerization reaction zone under polymerization conditions to copolymerize styrene and ethylene in the presence of said catalyst system; recovering a styrene ethylene copolymer having syndiotactic polystyrene blocks from said polymerization reaction zone.
 16. The method of claim 15 wherein said polymerization reaction zone is operated at a polymerization temperature within the range of 10-120° C.
 17. The method of claim 16 wherein said polymerization temperature is within the range of 15-80° C.
 18. The method of claim 16 wherein said polymerization temperature is within the range of 20-60° C.
 19. The process of claim 15 wherein said metallocene catalyst component is characterized by M being selected from the group consisting of yttrium, lanthanum, neodymium and samarium.
 20. The method of claim 19 wherein said metallocene catalyst component is characterized by M being samarium or neodymium.
 21. The method of claim 18 wherein said metallocene catalyst component is characterized by M being neodymium. 